{"dependency_graph":"https://dalicc.net/dependencygraph/dg_in","default_rules":[{"iri":"https://dalicc.net/dependencygraph/rules/endorsement-worldwide","action":"https://dalicc.net/ns#promote","action_label":"Promote","action_curie":"dalicc:promote","action_url":"/ns#promote","outcome":"https://dalicc.net/ns#NotGrantedByDefault","outcome_label":"Not granted by default","outcome_curie":"dalicc:NotGrantedByDefault","jurisdiction":"https://dalicc.net/ns#worldwide","jurisdiction_label":"Worldwide","basis":"Trademark and name rights are separate from copyright: Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 article 9 lets the proprietor of an EU trade mark prevent all third parties not having his consent from using the sign in the course of trade, and Directive (EU) 2015/2436 article 10, 15 U.S.C. 1114 and 1125(a), section 12 BGB and section 43 ABGB protect marks and names in the same way. The library's evidence is Creative Commons 4.0 section 2(b)(2): Patent and trademark rights are not licensed under this Public License. A copyright licence that is silent grants no right to use the licensor's name or marks to suggest endorsement","status":"https://dalicc.net/ns#Adopted","status_label":"Adopted","adopted":true,"date":"2026-09-23","label":"Endorsement is not granted by default","sentence":"The graph applies this reading in all jurisdictions it covers: Promote is not permitted unless the license permits it.","explanation":"A licence that says nothing about endorsement is read as not allowing it: the licence gives the licensee no right to use the licensor's name or marks in a way that states or implies that the licensor endorses the licensee or its product, while stating truthfully that a work is based on or uses the licensed work is a different act that this rule does not decide. A copyright licence grants rights in the work, and the right to use a name or a trademark is a separate right under trademark law and the protection of names, which a silent copyright licence does not pass on. Combining a licence that is silent about endorsement with one that permits it shows a conflict marked as coming from this rule.","replaces":"","contributor":"","date_accepted":""},{"iri":"https://dalicc.net/dependencygraph/rules/in-moral","action":"https://dalicc.net/ns#moralRightsRestriction","action_label":"Moral rights restriction","action_curie":"dalicc:moralRightsRestriction","action_url":"/ns#moralRightsRestriction","outcome":"https://dalicc.net/ns#NotWaivable","outcome_label":"Not waivable","outcome_curie":"dalicc:NotWaivable","jurisdiction":"https://dalicc.net/ns#IN","jurisdiction_label":"India","basis":"Copyright Act 1957 section 57(1): the author keeps the right to claim authorship and to restrain, or claim damages for, a distortion, mutilation or modification of the work that would be prejudicial to his honour or reputation, even after the copyright has been assigned; the Act does not say whether these rights can be waived by contract","status":"https://dalicc.net/ns#Proposed","status_label":"Proposed","adopted":false,"date":"2026-09-23","label":"The author's special rights survive an assignment in India","sentence":"This rule adds nothing to a licence that says nothing about moral rights; it reports a finding when a licence permits the licensee to set aside the author's special rights. The Copyright Act 1957 of India lets the author claim authorship and restrain a distortion, mutilation or modification of the work that would be prejudicial to his honour or reputation, even after the copyright has been assigned. The Act does not say whether these rights can be waived by contract, and the finding flags that risk rather than a settled rule.","explanation":"This rule adds nothing to a licence that says nothing about moral rights; it reports a finding when a licence permits the licensee to set aside the author's special rights. The Copyright Act 1957 of India lets the author claim authorship and restrain a distortion, mutilation or modification of the work that would be prejudicial to his honour or reputation, even after the copyright has been assigned. The Act does not say whether these rights can be waived by contract, and the finding flags that risk rather than a settled rule.","replaces":"","contributor":"","date_accepted":""},{"iri":"https://dalicc.net/dependencygraph/rules/in-interop","action":"https://dalicc.net/ns#reverseEngineerForInteroperability","action_label":"Reverse engineer for interoperability","action_curie":"dalicc:reverseEngineerForInteroperability","action_url":"/ns#reverseEngineerForInteroperability","outcome":"https://dalicc.net/ns#GrantedByDefault","outcome_label":"Granted by default","outcome_curie":"dalicc:GrantedByDefault","jurisdiction":"https://dalicc.net/ns#IN","jurisdiction_label":"India","basis":"Copyright Act 1957 section 52(1)(ab): a lawful possessor of a computer program may do any act necessary to obtain information essential for operating interoperability of an independently created program with other programs, provided the information is not otherwise readily available","status":"https://dalicc.net/ns#Proposed","status_label":"Proposed","adopted":false,"date":"2026-09-23","label":"Acts needed for interoperability are allowed unless the licence forbids them","sentence":"In India, Reverse engineer for interoperability is permitted unless the license prohibits it.","explanation":"A licence that says nothing about the acts needed for interoperability is read as allowing them. The Copyright Act 1957 of India states that a lawful possessor of a program does not infringe by doing what is necessary to obtain the information essential for an independently created program to operate with other programs, provided that information is not otherwise readily available. Combining a licence that is silent about it with one that prohibits it shows a conflict marked as coming from this rule.","replaces":"","contributor":"","date_accepted":""},{"iri":"https://dalicc.net/dependencygraph/rules/in-tdm","action":"https://dalicc.net/ns#textAndDataMining","action_label":"Text and data mining","action_curie":"dalicc:textAndDataMining","action_url":"/ns#textAndDataMining","outcome":"https://dalicc.net/ns#NotGrantedByDefault","outcome_label":"Not granted by default","outcome_curie":"dalicc:NotGrantedByDefault","jurisdiction":"https://dalicc.net/ns#IN","jurisdiction_label":"India","basis":"Copyright Act 1957 section 52 lists the acts that are not an infringement and names no general exception for text and data mining","status":"https://dalicc.net/ns#Proposed","status_label":"Proposed","adopted":false,"date":"2026-09-23","label":"Mining is not allowed unless the licence allows it","sentence":"In India, Text and data mining is not permitted unless the license permits it.","explanation":"A licence that says nothing about text and data mining is read as not allowing it. The Copyright Act 1957 of India lists the acts that are not an infringement and has no general entry for mining, so a mining act that reproduces a protected work needs a licence that grants it, unless a narrower exception such as fair dealing for private or personal use, including research (section 52(1)(a)(i)), applies to the facts. Combining a licence that is silent about it with one that permits it shows a conflict marked as coming from this rule.","replaces":"","contributor":"","date_accepted":""}]}