{"id":"SampleLicenseSl","title":"Sample License (SL)","reviewed_on":"2026-09-15","reviewer":"Giray Havur","text_source":"unavailable","text_retrieved":false,"verdict":"text-unavailable","summary":"This is not a license. It is the composer test fixture \"Sample License (SL)\", with a Sample Licensor, a Sample Creator, a joke warranty disclaimer and a stray odrl:assignee \"Sample Licensee\", shipped as production data under a public IRI. There is no legal text to check it against, so no finding about its permissions can be made. It needs a deprecation route, not a correction.","findings":[{"rubric":1,"severity":"major","field":"dct:title","description":"The record has no cc:legalcode, no dct:source and no dct:alternative, so nothing in it points at a document. The warranty disclaimer reads \"This is a disclaimer. No programmer were harmed during the creation of this license :).\" This is a fixture that reached production, as docs/DATA.md already records.","action":"none"},{"rubric":1,"severity":"major","field":"cc:license","description":"The record carries two cc:license values, dalicclib:CC-BY-4.0 and dalicclib:MIT. The composer wrote the user's \"licensed under\" choice to the same predicate the library uses for the record's own license. A separate predicate is needed; that is a code fix, not a data fix.","action":"none"},{"rubric":1,"severity":"minor","field":"odrl:assignee","description":"A stray odrl:assignee \"Sample Licensee\" is present. No other record has one and nothing renders it.","action":"none"},{"rubric":10,"severity":"major","field":"record","description":"Recommendation: keep the IRI, mark the record as withdrawn rather than delete it, and exclude it from the library list, the search index and the homepage count. A dct:isReplacedBy is not appropriate because nothing replaces it. The two triples below make the status explicit and machine-readable without removing a published IRI; they need a vocabulary term first.","action":"proposed","change":"dalicc:recordStatus dalicc:deprecated ;\ndalicc:additionalClauses \"Test fixture of the license composer. Not a license and not legal advice. Retained because the identifier has been published; excluded from the license library listing.\" ;\n"},{"rubric":8,"severity":"gap","field":"vocabulary","description":"There is no way to say that a record is not a public license. Proposed terms: dalicc:recordStatus with the values dalicc:active, dalicc:deprecated and dalicc:testFixture. The same mechanism would serve any future withdrawal.","action":"none"},{"rubric":2,"severity":"minor","field":"odrl:target","description":"The asset collection lists dcmitype:Software, which the family conventions checked before the review flags. For a fixture the target type means nothing.","action":"none"}],"family":"Sample and test records","port_of":null,"variant_kind":null,"notes":"No legal text exists, so the verdict is text-unavailable rather than correct or corrected. Nothing was changed in the file. DeveloperLicense, the other record with fixture characteristics, is in review group 2 and was not touched here."}