Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Brazil
Also known as Attribution 2.0, Attribution 2.0 Brazil, CC BY 2.0, CC BY 2.0 BR, CC-BY 2.0, CC-BY-2.0, CC-BY-2.0 BR, Creative Commons BY 2.0, Creative Commons BY 2.0 BR.
- Commercial use
- allowed
- Share alike
- not required
- Attribution
- required (keep the copyright and license notices)
Write this as a license text (needs an account) DALICC reads the model above and writes what it permits, requires and prohibits in plain English. Without an account, the Text download above writes the model out from the vocabulary.
Permissions
-
Charge distribution fee from the text Charging a fee for the act of providing a copy of the work to someone else.
-
Commercial use from the text Using the work to generate income, directly or indirectly, for example by selling it or by using it in advertising.
-
Derivative works from the text Distributing an adaptation of the work and making it available to the public.
-
Derive from the text Creating a new work from the work, such as a translation, adaptation or arrangement of it or of a part of it.
Duties
- Attribution from the text Giving credit to the copyright holders or authors of the work, in the form the licensor asks for.
- Modification notice from the text Marking a changed work as changed, saying how it differs from the original and keeping earlier notices of change.
- Notice from the text Notice: keeping the license and copyright notices with every copy.
-
Duties
- Attribution from the text Giving credit to the copyright holders or authors of the work, in the form the licensor asks for.
- Notice from the text Notice: keeping the license and copyright notices with every copy.
-
Modified works from the text Distributing a modified version of the work that does not amount to a new, derivative work.
-
Modify from the text Altering the work, for example by updating it, without creating a new work; an alteration that creates a new work is Derive.
Duties
- Attribution from the text Giving credit to the copyright holders or authors of the work, in the form the licensor asks for.
- Modification notice from the text Marking a changed work as changed, saying how it differs from the original and keeping earlier notices of change.
- Notice from the text Notice: keeping the license and copyright notices with every copy.
-
Present from the text Performing the work in public, including by broadcast or other communication to the public.
Prohibitions
-
Change license from the text Not permitted: Change license. Replacing the license of the work, or of an adaptation, with another license, or changing its terms.
-
Promote from the text Not permitted: Promote. Using the name or trademarks of the licensor or of contributors to endorse or promote a product.
-
Sublicense from the text Not permitted: Sublicense. Granting a third party rights in the work under a license of the licensee's own, rather than passing on the original license.
License-wide duties
This license states no duties that apply to the work as a whole.
What applies by default
The statements above are the library's reading of this license: each is marked with the sentence it rests on, or as a library convention where the text is not explicit. The statements below are the ones the DALICC reasoner supplies for acts the license says nothing about, from the default rules of the dependency graph it reasons with. Each one names the legal source it rests on. None of it is in the record.
No default rule of that graph reaches this license: it speaks about every act the rules are about.
Further terms
These are the things the license says about itself beyond the acts it permits, forbids and requires: when it ends, how long there is to put a breach right, which law governs it, and so on. A term that comes from the DALICC vocabulary links to its definition.
Clauses
Warranty disclaimer
EXCETO QUANDO FOR DE OUTRA FORMA MUTUAMENTE ACORDADO PELAS PARTES POR ESCRITO, O LICENCIANTE OFERECE A OBRA “NO ESTADO EM QUE SE ENCONTRA” (AS IS) E NÃO PRESTA QUAISQUER GARANTIAS OU DECLARAÇÕES DE QUALQUER ESPÉCIE RELATIVAS À OBRA, SEJAM ELAS EXPRESSAS OU IMPLÍCITAS, DECORRENTES DA LEI OU QUAISQUER OUTRAS, INCLUINDO, SEM LIMITAÇÃO, QUAISQUER GARANTIAS SOBRE A TITULARIDADE DA OBRA, ADEQUAÇÃO PARA QUAISQUER PROPÓSITOS, NÃO-VIOLAÇÃO DE DIREITOS, OU INEXISTÊNCIA DE QUAISQUER DEFEITOS LATENTES, ACURACIDADE, PRESENÇA OU AUSÊNCIA DE ERROS, SEJAM ELES APARENTES OU OCULTOS. EM JURISDIÇÕES QUE NÃO ACEITEM A EXCLUSÃO DE GARANTIAS IMPLÍCITAS, ESTAS EXCLUSÕES PODEM NÃO SE APLICAR A VOCÊ.
Limitation of liability
EXCETO NA EXTENSÃO EXIGIDA PELA LEI APLICÁVEL, EM NENHUMA CIRCUNSTÂNCIA O LICENCIANTE SERÁ RESPONSÁVEL PARA COM VOCÊ POR QUAISQUER DANOS, ESPECIAIS, INCIDENTAIS, CONSEQÜENCIAIS, PUNITIVOS OU EXEMPLARES, ORIUNDOS DESTA LICENÇA OU DO USO DA OBRA, MESMO QUE O LICENCIANTE TENHA SIDO AVISADO SOBRE A POSSIBILIDADE DE TAIS DANOS.
Info
- Target asset types
- Creative work (i.e. text, picture, sound, movie)
- Region / jurisdiction
- Brazil
- Validity
- Perpetual
- Source
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/br/
- Legal code
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/br/legalcode
- This description is published under
- Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
- Publisher
- Creative Commons
- SPDX identifier
CC-BY-2.0(provisional, the record declares none)- Version
- 2.0
- DALICC identifier
CreativeCommonsAttribution20Brazil
This record is published under CC BY 4.0. Credit it as: DALICC License Library, DALICC - Verein zur Förderung der Rechtssicherheit in der Datenbewirtschaftung, https://dalicc.net, CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The license it describes belongs to its publisher.
Use this license
Everything below is generated from this record. Replace the example address with the address of your own work.
JSON sidecar
{
"license-uri": "https://dalicc.net/licenselibrary/CreativeCommonsAttribution20Brazil",
"license-title": "Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Brazil",
"spdx-id": null,
"attribution": "Copyright (c) [year] [copyright holder]",
"asset": null,
"generated-by": "DALICC"
}
RDF, Turtle
@prefix cc: <http://creativecommons.org/ns#> .
<https://example.org/my-work>
cc:license <https://dalicc.net/licenselibrary/CreativeCommonsAttribution20Brazil> .
RDF, JSON-LD
{
"@context": {
"cc": "http://creativecommons.org/ns#"
},
"@id": "https://example.org/my-work",
"cc:license": {
"@id": "https://dalicc.net/licenselibrary/CreativeCommonsAttribution20Brazil"
}
}
HTML attribution
<p>This work is licensed under <a href="https://dalicc.net/licenselibrary/CreativeCommonsAttribution20Brazil" rel="license">Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Brazil</a>.</p>
This license asks for attribution, so the credit line is part of it.
Badge
Markdown
[](https://dalicc.net/license-library/CreativeCommonsAttribution20Brazil)
HTML
<a href="https://dalicc.net/license-library/CreativeCommonsAttribution20Brazil"><img src="https://dalicc.net/license-library/CreativeCommonsAttribution20Brazil/badge.svg" alt="License: Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Brazil"></a>
Review
- Status
- Reviewed against the license text
- Last checked
- 2026-09-15
- Reviewer
- Giray Havur
- Verdict
- corrected during the review
- Record changed since this review
- yes (version 2, 2026-09-24)
- Findings
- 16 recorded, 2 applied to the record, 2 proposed, 1 settled in a later version
The record models the Attribution element set of the Creative Commons 2.0 port for Brazil, read in Portuguese from the legal code. The permissions, prohibitions and duties all follow from the grant in Section 3 and the restrictions in Section 4, and the clause texts are quoted from this port rather than from the unported version. Applied: dct:source. The remaining findings are library-wide rather than defects of this record: the sublicensing prohibition, the no-additional-terms prohibition, the asset types, and, for the version, the clauses that 2.0 settles per jurisdiction.
15 findings
-
minor Rubric 1
dct:sourceappliedThe record carried cc:legalcode but no dct:source, so it had a single provenance link where the 4.0 International parents carry two. The canonical URL of the port, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/br/, was added, which is the pair, legal code plus deed, that the parents use and that the other 2.0 port group applied as well.
-
info Rubric 1
spdx:licenseIdnoneSPDX has no identifier for this port. The legal-code URL implies CC-BY-2.0-BR, which the SPDX licence list does not define, so none was invented.
-
minor Rubric 2
odrl:targetproposedThe asset collection is dalicc:CreativeWork alone, while the 4.0 International parent carries dalicc:CreativeWork and dcmitype:Dataset. The port grants the rights in all media and formats, and a database is a protected work under the copyright law of the porting jurisdiction, so the legal text supports the wider collection. The association's review decided that asset types follow the legal text; the change is proposed rather than applied because it has to be made in all 287 Creative Commons ports at once, not in the seventeen of this review group.
-
info Rubric 3
odrl:permissionnoneEvery modelled permission follows from the grant in Section 3, which gives a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive and perpetual licence, for the duration of the applicable copyright, to reproduce the work, to incorporate it into collections, to distribute, to display and to perform it publicly, and to create and reproduce derivative works.
-
major Rubric 4
odrl:prohibitionproposedSection 4(a) also forbids imposing terms that alter or restrict the licence or the recipient's exercise of the rights granted. dalicc:addLimitation expresses exactly that and the record does not carry it. Proposed, not applied, because the same sentence stands in every Creative Commons record of the library.
-
info Rubric 4
odrl:prohibitionnonedalicc:ChangeLicense is prohibited, which rests on the obligation to distribute only under the terms of this licence. dalicc:promote is prohibited, which rests on the reservation of all rights not expressly granted and on the trademark paragraph of the Creative Commons notice rather than on a clause of the licence body.
-
info Rubric 5
odrl:dutynonecc:Attribution and cc:Notice hang on odrl:distribute, and cc:Attribution, cc:Notice and dalicc:modificationNotice on odrl:modify and odrl:derive, which matches Section 4: a copy of the licence or its URI must travel with every copy, all notices referring to the licence and to the warranty disclaimer must be kept intact, credit must be given to the original author, and a derivative work must carry a credit identifying the use made of the work. No duty is duplicated and none sits at the wrong level.
-
info Rubric 6
dalicc:WarrantyDisclaimernoneThe warranty disclaimer and the liability limitation are quoted in Portuguese from the Brazilian legal code and match its Sections 5 and 6. The reservation of unnamed rights, the downstream offer to recipients, the termination rule and the severability and entire-agreement paragraphs are not carried anywhere: no Creative Commons record in the library uses dalicc:additionalClauses.
-
info Rubric 7
cc:jurisdictionnonecc:jurisdiction is bpicounty:Brazil, which matches the country of the legal-code URL, and dalicc:validityType is dalicc:perpetual, which matches the grant for the duration of the applicable copyright. The jurisdiction field records the legal home of the port, not a territorial limit: the grant itself is worldwide.
-
gap Rubric 8
odrl:prohibitionnoneThe technological measures clause has no vocabulary term. Section 4(a) of the port: "Você não pode distribuir, exibir publicamente, executar publicamente ou executar publicamente de forma digital a Obra com qualquer medida tecnológica que controle o acesso ou o uso da Obra." Proposed term: dalicc:applyTechnicalProtectionMeasures, an odrl:Action to be used as an odrl:Prohibition.
-
gap Rubric 8
recordnoneAutomatic termination on breach and the survival of the disclaimer and the miscellaneous sections have no term, and neither has the automatic offer the licensor makes to every downstream recipient. Proposed terms: dalicc:terminationOnBreach and dalicc:downstreamOffer. The Brazilian port settles the royalty question for musical works in its own way: the licensor waives the exclusive right to collect public-performance and mechanical royalties, individually or through a collecting society, naming ECAD, ASCAP, BMI, SESAC and the Harry Fox agency, but expressly reserves the right to collect webcasting royalties through SoundExchange or ECAD where the licensee's digital performance is directed toward commercial advantage. The 4.0 International parent waives collection outright. None of this is expressible.
-
info Rubric 8
recordnoneThe port works with the Brazilian notion of Obra Coletiva, a collective work, and states that a collective work is not a derivative work. The distinction has no counterpart in the model.
-
info Rubric 9
recordnoneThe consistency check with the 41 axioms of licensedata/dependencygraph/dg_default.ttl reports no conflict, before and after the correction, and the pre-review baseline listed none either.
-
info Rubric 10
recordnonePort of the Attribution element set. Its deontic model is identical, statement for statement, to the 4.0 International record CC-BY-4.0 after that record was corrected in the same review group, apart from the asset collection. What differs in the documents and not in the model is the version: 2.0 prohibits sublicensing expressly, has no cure period for a breach, has no sui generis database rights clause and settles the royalty and collecting-society question per jurisdiction, while 4.0 adds Section 4 on database rights and the 30 day cure period. The three ports of this element set in this review group, Brazil, Croatia and Italy, carry one and the same model, so the compatibility checker cannot tell them apart either.
-
major Rubric 7
dalicc:terminatesOnBreachappliedThe termination clause of this port reads: "Esta Licença e os direitos aqui concedidos terminarão automaticamente no caso de qualquer violação dos termos desta Licença por Você." The licence ends automatically on a breach and this version of the text has no reinstatement clause, so dalicc:terminatesOnBreach is true and no dalicc:curePeriod is written, as on the unported record of the same version.
Settled in version 2 (1)
-
settled
odrl:prohibitionThe licence forbids sublicensing and the record does not say so. Section 4(a) of the port: "Você não pode sublicenciar a Obra." The vocabulary has dalicc:sublicense, defined and used by no record. The association's review decided provisionally that the sublicensing prohibition should be modelled on every Creative Commons record, so it is recorded here with the exact triple and applied in one library-wide sweep.
Report an issue The review record as JSON The review checks the model against the license text. It is not legal advice.
History
This license model has 2 versions. Version 2 is the one served today; every earlier version keeps its own address, so a conclusion drawn from one of them can still be checked against it.
-
Version 2 current2026-09-24 Giray Havur
The content review of 2026-09-15 added 1 identification detail and 1 prohibition, recorded the relation to the record this one was adapted from and recorded the review state. Later changes recorded when the license ends on a breach and named the license the record itself is published under.
View version 2 JSON-LD Turtle RDF/XML
9 changes
-
added
dalicc:jurisdictionPortOf dalicclib:CC-BY-4.0Port relation The 2026-09-15 review made the relation between a jurisdiction port and the record it was adapted from explicit in the data.
-
added
dalicc:licenseVersion "2.0"Port relation The 2026-09-15 review made the relation between a jurisdiction port and the record it was adapted from explicit in the data.
-
added
dalicc:reviewStatus dalicc:ReviewedReview state Every record records how far it has come in the editorial workflow and when it was last checked against the legal text.
-
added
dalicc:reviewedOn "2026-09-15"^^xsd:dateReview state Every record records how far it has come in the editorial workflow and when it was last checked against the legal text.
-
added
dalicc:variantKind "jurisdiction-port"Port relation The 2026-09-15 review made the relation between a jurisdiction port and the record it was adapted from explicit in the data.
-
added
dct:source <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/br/>Review finding The record carried cc:legalcode but no dct:source, so it had a single provenance link where the 4.0 International parents carry two. The canonical URL of the port, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/br/, was added, which is the pair, legal code plus deed, that the parents use and that the other 2.0 port group applied as well.
-
added
prohibition dalicc:sublicenseReview decision Review decision 1: every Creative Commons record except the CC0 dedication, plus the Open Database License and the Open Data Commons Attribution License, forbids sublicensing in as many words.
-
added
dalicc:terminatesOnBreach "true"^^xsd:booleanManual edit The termination clause of this port reads: "Esta Licença e os direitos aqui concedidos terminarão automaticamente no caso de qualquer violação dos termos desta Licença por Você."
-
added
dct:license <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/>Manual edit Every record is published under CC BY 4.0. cc:license names the record DALICC keeps of that licence; dct:license now names it by the address Creative Commons publishes it at, so that a consumer matching the canonical IRI finds it.
-
-
Version 1
The version this model had before the content review of 2026-09-15.
Every change names the reason behind it: a finding of the content review, one of its library-wide decisions, the metadata that review wrote onto every record, or a hand edit. None of it is legal advice.
Nothing on this page is legal advice. What a license means is decided by its text; ask a legal advisor before you rely on it.