Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 2.0 Chile

minor Rubric 1 dct:source applied

The record carried cc:legalcode but no dct:source. The legal code page states the canonical URL of the licence, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/cl/, and the six 4.0 International parents carry exactly that pair, legal code plus deed. Added.

minor Rubric 2 odrl:target proposed

The record targets dalicc:CreativeWork only, while the 4.0 International parent CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 targets dalicc:CreativeWork and dcmitype:Dataset. The Chilean 2.0 port names no database and no data compilation anywhere: the word "base de datos" does not occur in any of its six legal texts. The "Obra" is "aquella creacion derivada de la inteligencia en los dominios literarios, artisticos y cientificos ... susceptible de proteccion via derecho de autor". Creative Commons licences are media neutral and this one grants the rights in all media and formats now known or later invented, so the asset type is plausible, but nothing in this port's text licenses a database right. Aligning the ports that are silent on the point with the parents is a single library wide decision, so it is proposed rather than applied.

info Rubric 3 odrl:permission none

Every modelled permission is supported by the grant. Section 3 grants "una licencia mundial, gratuita, no exclusiva y permanente (durante todo el período de vigencia de los derechos de autor)", a worldwide, free, non exclusive and permanent licence. It covers reproduction, incorporation into collective works, distribution of copies, public exhibition, public performance and making available to the public. The record models this as odrl:reproduce, odrl:distribute, odrl:display, odrl:present, plus odrl:modify and dalicc:ModifiedWorks, which rest on the technical modification sentence of the grant: Section 3: "Los derechos antes mencionados incluyen el derecho a realizar dichas modificaciones en la medida que sean tecnicamente necesarias para ejercer los derechos en otro medio o formatos." In this NoDerivatives set the grant list stops short of any right to adapt, which is why the record prohibits odrl:derive while still permitting odrl:modify: the only modification allowed is the one the grant calls technically necessary. The 4.0 International parent CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 models it in exactly the same way.

minor Rubric 3 odrl:permission proposed

The record permits dalicc:chargeDistributionFee while prohibiting cc:CommercialUse. Section 4: "Usted no puede ejercer ninguno de los derechos que le han sido otorgados en la Sección 3 precedente de modo que estén principalmente destinados o directamente dirigidos a conseguir un provecho comercial o una compensación monetaria privada", with the file sharing carve out that follows it. The vocabulary defines dalicc:chargeDistributionFee as a fee covering the act of providing the work to a third party, so a pure cost recovery fee is arguable under the primary purpose test, but the statement sits uneasily next to the prohibition. The same statement is in the 4.0 International parent CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 and in every NonCommercial record of the library, so removing it is one library wide decision, not a defect of this port.

info Rubric 4 odrl:prohibition none

dalicc:ChangeLicense is prohibited, which the licence supports: Section 4: "No es posible ofrecer o imponer ninguna condición sobre la Obra que altere o limite las condiciones de esta Licencia o el ejercicio de los derechos de los destinatarios otorgados en este documento." dalicc:promote is prohibited, which rests on the reservation of all rights not expressly granted and the Creative Commons trademark paragraph of the notice around the licence body, not a clause of the licence itself cc:CommercialUse is prohibited, which the NonCommercial element of this set states directly. odrl:derive is prohibited, which follows from a grant that never lists a right to adapt the work; the NoDerivatives element is expressed by the absence of the derivative right rather than by a separate prohibition in the text.

info Rubric 5 odrl:duty none

The attribution and notice duties are present and supported. Section 4 requires a copy of the licence or its Uniform Resource Identifier with every copy or recording distributed, exhibited, performed or made available, and that every notice referring to the licence and to the warranty clause of section 5 be kept intact. Credit is owed to the "Autor Original", by name or pseudonym if given, with the title of the work and, where practicable, the URI the licensor specifies; a derivative work must carry a credit identifying the use made of the work, for example "Traduccion al frances de la Obra del Autor Original". The duties hang on odrl:distribute and odrl:modify, which matches the licence, since they are triggered by making the work public rather than by private use; odrl:derive is prohibited in this NoDerivatives set, so the duties reach only distribution and the technically necessary modification.

minor Rubric 5 odrl:duty none

The record hangs dalicc:modificationNotice on odrl:modify, and this NoDerivatives text has no clause to support it: because the grant never reaches an adaptation, the port carries no requirement to mark changes and no derivative credit sentence at all, unlike the other five element sets of the same port. The only modification the licence allows is the technically necessary one, which needs no notice. The 4.0 International parent CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 carries exactly the same statement, so this is a family wide modelling choice rather than a defect of this port, and removing it would split the NoDerivatives family. It does not change the compatibility outcome, since the duty is attached to a permission the licence grants only for format shifting.

info Rubric 6 dalicc:WarrantyDisclaimer none

dalicc:WarrantyDisclaimer and dalicc:LiabilityLimitation are quoted from the Spanish text of this port and not from the English unported version, and each field holds its own clause. Section 5 (Garantia) and section 6 (Limitacion de responsabilidad) are separate sections of the legal code and the record keeps them apart: dalicc:WarrantyDisclaimer holds section 5 and dalicc:LiabilityLimitation holds section 6, both quoted verbatim in Spanish and in the upper case of the original.

minor Rubric 6 dalicc:LiabilityLimitation none

dalicc:LiabilityLimitation reproduces the Chilean text as the Attribution 2.0 Chile page publishes it, including the misspelling "PATRINMONIALES" for "PATRIMONIALES" and the closing sentence "ALGUNAS LEYES NO PERMITEN LA EXCLUSIÓN DE CIERTA RESPONSABILIDAD, EN CUYO CASO ESTA EXCLUSIÓN PUEDE NO APLICARSE A USTED", which the by-sa, by-nd and by-nc-nd pages of the same port do not print. The substance is the same in all six pages, so this is a quotation source note, not a modelling defect, and the quote was left untouched.

info Rubric 6 dalicc:additionalClauses none

The record has no dalicc:additionalClauses, so the clauses the ODRL policy cannot carry stay invisible: the reservation of unnamed rights, the downstream offer to recipients, the severability, waiver and entire agreement paragraphs and the termination rule. Section 7 ends the licence automatically on breach, keeps the licences of downstream recipients of derivative and collective works alive and lets sections 1, 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8 survive; section 8 makes the licensor offer every recipient a licence on the same terms. The whole Creative Commons family is modelled this way.

info Rubric 7 cc:jurisdiction none

cc:jurisdiction is bpicounty:Chile, which matches the country of the legal code URL https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/cl/legalcode, and dalicc:validityType is dalicc:perpetual, which matches a grant made for the duration of copyright. The Chilean 2.0 port has no choice of law clause at all: section 8 ends with the severability, waiver and entire agreement paragraphs and says nothing about the applicable law. cc:jurisdiction bpicounty:Chile therefore records the port, not a forum chosen by the text.

gap Rubric 8 odrl:prohibition none

The licence forbids technological protection measures and the vocabulary has no term for it. Section 4: "Usted no puede distribuir, exhibir públicamente, ejecutar públicamente, o poner a disposición pública la Obra con alguna medida tecnológica que controle el acceso o la utilización de ella de una forma que sea inconsistente con las condiciones de esta Licencia." Proposed term: dalicc:applyTechnicalProtectionMeasures, an odrl:Action to be used as an odrl:Prohibition. Not modelled, because bending an existing term would be worse than the gap.

gap Rubric 8 record none

The automatic termination of the licence on breach, the survival of the named sections and the licence the licensor offers to every downstream recipient have no vocabulary terms. Section 7 ends the licence automatically on breach, keeps the licences of downstream recipients of derivative and collective works alive and lets sections 1, 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8 survive; section 8 makes the licensor offer every recipient a licence on the same terms. Proposed terms: dalicc:terminationOnBreach and dalicc:downstreamOffer.

info Rubric 8 record none

The Chilean 2.0 port has no moral rights clause at all: neither "derechos morales" nor any equivalent appears in the licence body, so the inalienable moral rights of Chilean law (Ley 17.336) are left to the statute. Section 6 mentions "daños morales" only as a head of damage. Among the ports reviewed so far this puts Chile with France and Poland rather than with Austria, the Netherlands or Germany. Nothing is missing from the record here, but the silence is worth recording next to the ports that do speak.

gap Rubric 8 record none

Section 4 reserves royalty collection for musical works in all six element sets, including the plain Attribution licence: "Cuando la Obra es una composicion o interpretacion musical el Licenciante se reserva el derecho exclusivo de percibir, ya sea individualmente o a traves de una sociedad de gestion de derechos (p. ej. SCD u otras), los derechos por ejecucion publica o puesta a disposicion publica de la Obra (p. ej webcast), si dicha ejecucion esta basicamente intencionada o dirigida a obtener un provecho comercial o una compensacion monetaria privada." The vocabulary has no term for a reserved or waived royalty collection right. Proposed term: dalicc:royaltyCollectionReserved, with a companion for the waiver.

info Rubric 9 record none

The consistency check with the forty one axioms of licensedata/dependencygraph/dg_default.ttl reports no conflict, before and after the corrections, and the pre review baseline listed none for this record either.

info Rubric 10 record none

Port of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International. The deontic model of this record is identical to the parent, statement for statement, apart from odrl:target: the same permissions with the same duties, the same prohibitions and the same set level duties. What differs is the jurisdiction, the language of the legal text, the clause texts, and the version specific clauses of 2.0 that the model does not carry, chiefly the express prohibition of sublicensing, the technological measures clause and the royalty collection arrangements. The compatibility checker cannot tell this record from any other record of the BY-NC-ND element set, across all three versions and every jurisdiction the library holds.

minor Rubric 4 odrl:prohibition applied

dalicc:promote was prohibited and no sentence of this text supports it. The statement was the library's reading of a legal default, that a copyright licence which says nothing about endorsement grants no right to it, and it sat in 519 of 581 records as a house convention. That reading is now an adopted dalicc:DefaultRule of the core dependency graph, which supplies it to every licence that is silent about the action, so a compatibility check reaches the same answer and the record states only what the text states. Removed on 2026-09-23; see section 13 of docs/LICENSE_REVIEW.md.

major Rubric 7 dalicc:terminatesOnBreach applied

The termination clause of this port reads: "Esta Licencia y los derechos otorgados en virtud de ella terminarán automáticamente si Usted infringe alguna condición establecida en ella." The licence ends automatically on a breach and this version of the text has no reinstatement clause, so dalicc:terminatesOnBreach is true and no dalicc:curePeriod is written, as on the unported record of the same version.

settled odrl:prohibition

The licence forbids sublicensing and the record does not say so. Section 4: "No es posible sublicenciar la Obra." The vocabulary already has dalicc:sublicense, but no record in the library uses it and its skos:note says so, and the same sentence stands in every Creative Commons 2.0 and 3.0 record, so adding it to this review group alone would split the compatibility behaviour of one family. Proposed as one library wide correction, together with an update of the vocabulary note.