Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Austria

minor Rubric 1 dct:source applied

The record carried cc:legalcode but no dct:source. The legal code page of the port states the canonical URL of the licence, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/at/, and the six 4.0 International parents carry exactly that pair, legal code plus deed. Added.

info Rubric 1 spdx:licenseId none

The SPDX licence list defines no identifier for this port. The id that the legal code URL implies, CC-BY-NC-ND-3.0-AT, is not on the list, so none was invented. Only four records of this review group can take an SPDX identifier: CC-BY-3.0-AU, CC-BY-3.0-AT, CC-BY-3.0-US and CC-BY-SA-3.0-AT.

minor Rubric 2 odrl:target applied

The record targeted dalicc:CreativeWork alone, while the 4.0 International parent CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 targets dalicc:CreativeWork and dcmitype:Dataset. This port names a database as licensed subject matter in its own text: Ziffer 3: "Soweit Datenbanken oder Zusammenstellungen von Daten Schutzgegenstand dieser Lizenz oder Teil dessen sind und einen immaterialgüterrechtlichen Schutz eigener Art genießen, verzichtet der Lizenzgeber auf die Geltendmachung sämtlicher daraus resultierender Rechte." Ziffer 4 adds that the restrictions do not apply to parts of the Schutzgegenstand that fall under the definition only because they enjoy sui generis database protection. Since the text is explicit, dcmitype:Dataset was added here rather than left to the library wide decision that covers the ports whose text says nothing about databases.

info Rubric 3 odrl:permission none

Every modelled permission is supported by the grant. Ziffer 3 grants the "vergütungsfreie, räumlich und zeitlich (für die Dauer des Urheberrechts oder verwandten Schutzrechts am Schutzgegenstand) unbeschränkte Nutzungsbewilligung", a permission of use free of remuneration and unlimited in place and time. The grant covers reproduction of the work, its inclusion in a collection and its reproduction as part of that collection, and distribution and public communication or performance of the work alone or as part of a collection, together with the modifications that are technically necessary to exercise those rights in other media and formats. The adaptation right is not in the grant. The record models this as odrl:reproduce, odrl:distribute, odrl:display, odrl:present. The record also carries odrl:modify and dalicc:ModifiedWorks, which the next finding addresses.

minor Rubric 3 odrl:permission proposed

The record permits dalicc:chargeDistributionFee while prohibiting cc:CommercialUse. Ziffer 4.c): "Die Nutzungsbewilligung gemaess Abschnitt 3 gilt nur fuer Handlungen, die nicht vorrangig einem kommerziellen Zweck dienen." File sharing without payment is expressly not commercial. The vocabulary defines dalicc:chargeDistributionFee as a fee covering the act of providing the work to a third party, so a pure cost recovery fee is arguable under the commercial advantage test, but the statement sits uneasily next to the prohibition. The same statement is in the 4.0 International parent CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 and in all 145 NonCommercial records of the library, so removing it is one library wide decision, not a defect of this port.

info Rubric 4 odrl:prohibition none

cc:CommercialUse is prohibited, which the NonCommercial clause states directly. Ziffer 4.c): "Die Nutzungsbewilligung gemaess Abschnitt 3 gilt nur fuer Handlungen, die nicht vorrangig einem kommerziellen Zweck dienen." File sharing without payment is expressly not commercial. dalicc:ChangeLicense is prohibited, which the licence supports: the licensee may offer the work only under the terms of this licence and may not offer or impose terms that alter or restrict it. dalicc:promote is prohibited, which rests on the reservation of all rights not expressly granted and on the trademark paragraph of the Creative Commons notice around the licence, not on a clause of the licence body. odrl:derive is prohibited, which the NoDerivatives clause states directly. The grant of Ziffer 3 of the NoDerivatives port omits the adaptation right entirely: it lists only reproduction, integration into collections, and public communication and distribution.

info Rubric 5 odrl:duty none

The attribution and notice duties are present and supported. Ziffer 4.d) requires the Rechtevermerke to be left untouched and the Rechteinhaberschaft to be acknowledged by naming the Rechteinhaber or the Zuschreibungsempfaenger designated by the Lizenzgeber, the title of the content, the Uniform Resource Identifier given by the Lizenzgeber, and, for an adaptation, a statement that the work is a Bearbeitung. The duties hang on odrl:distribute and odrl:modify, which matches the licence, since they are triggered by making the work public rather than by private use.

info Rubric 6 dalicc:WarrantyDisclaimer none

dalicc:WarrantyDisclaimer and dalicc:LiabilityLimitation are quoted verbatim from the German text of this port and not from the English Unported version, and they match the disclaimer section and the limitation of liability section of the legal code. Each field holds its own clause, with no overlap between the two.

info Rubric 6 dalicc:additionalClauses none

The record has no dalicc:additionalClauses, so the clauses the ODRL policy cannot carry, the reservation of unnamed rights, the downstream offer to recipients, the severability, waiver and entire agreement paragraphs and the termination rule, are not visible in the record at all. The whole Creative Commons family is modelled this way.

info Rubric 7 cc:jurisdiction none

cc:jurisdiction is bpicounty:Austria, which matches the country of the legal code URL, and dalicc:validityType is dalicc:perpetual, which matches a grant for the duration of copyright. On the governing law: Ziffer 8: "Sofern zwischen Ihnen und dem Lizenzgeber keine anderweitige Vereinbarung getroffen wurde und soweit Wahlfreiheit besteht, findet auf diesen Lizenzvertrag das Recht der Republik Österreich Anwendung." Note that the jurisdiction field records the legal home of the port, not a territorial limit on the grant: the grant itself is worldwide.

gap Rubric 8 odrl:prohibition none

The licence forbids technological protection measures and the vocabulary has no term for it. Ziffer 4.a) forbids technical measures that can hinder the user of the Schutzgegenstand in exercising the rights granted by the licence ("dürfen Sie (in Bezug auf den Schutzgegenstand) keine technischen Maßnahmen ergreifen, die den Nutzer des Schutzgegenstandes in der Ausübung der ihm durch diese Lizenz gewährten Rechte behindern können"). Proposed term: dalicc:applyTechnicalProtectionMeasures, an odrl:Action to be used as an odrl:Prohibition. Not modelled, because bending an existing term would be worse than the gap.

gap Rubric 8 record none

The automatic termination of the licence on breach, and the survival of the definitions, the disclaimer, the limitation of liability and the miscellaneous sections, have no vocabulary term. Proposed term: dalicc:terminationOnBreach. The downstream offer, under which every recipient of the work or of an adaptation receives a licence directly from the licensor on the same terms, has none either. Proposed term: dalicc:downstreamOffer.

gap Rubric 8 record none

The moral rights clause of this port is not expressible. Ziffer 4.g): "(Urheber)Persönlichkeitsrechte bleiben - soweit sie bestehen - von dieser Lizenz unberührt." The Austrian port leaves the author personality rights untouched rather than restricting the licensee or binding the licensor. Proposed terms: dalicc:moralRightsRestriction and dalicc:moralRightsNonAssertion, so that the direction of the clause can be recorded.

gap Rubric 8 record none

The royalty collection arrangement is not expressible. Ziffer 3 and 4.f) keep the non-waivable statutory remuneration claims with the Lizenzgeber and reserve the exclusive right, personally or through a Verwertungsgesellschaft (collecting society), to claim remuneration for any use that is not the non-commercial use defined in Ziffer 4.c), while waiving it for all other licence compliant use. Proposed term: dalicc:royaltyCollectionReserved, with a value saying whether the claim is reserved or waived and for which kind of use. This matters to a user of the model, because a licence that reads as royalty free can still leave a collecting society claim standing.

info Rubric 9 record none

The consistency check with the 41 axioms of licensedata/dependencygraph/dg_default.ttl reports no conflict, before and after the corrections, and the pre-review baseline listed none for this record either.

info Rubric 10 record none

Port of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International. The deontic model of this record is identical to the parent CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0, statement for statement: the same permissions with the same duties, the same prohibitions and the same set level duties. The odrl:target now agrees with the parent as well. What differs is the jurisdiction, the language of the legal text and the clause texts, and the version specific clauses of 3.0 that the model does not carry, chiefly the express prohibition of sublicensing, the technological measures clause, the moral rights clause and the royalty collection arrangements. The compatibility checker cannot tell this record from the other records of the BY-NC-ND element set, across all three versions and every jurisdiction the library holds.

minor Rubric 4 odrl:prohibition applied

dalicc:promote was prohibited and no sentence of this text supports it. The statement was the library's reading of a legal default, that a copyright licence which says nothing about endorsement grants no right to it, and it sat in 519 of 581 records as a house convention. That reading is now an adopted dalicc:DefaultRule of the core dependency graph, which supplies it to every licence that is silent about the action, so a compatibility check reaches the same answer and the record states only what the text states. Removed on 2026-09-23; see section 13 of docs/LICENSE_REVIEW.md.

major Rubric 3 odrl:permission applied

The record said nothing about the sui generis database right although the port's own text settles it, which the rubric 2 finding of this review read off the legal code: Ziffer 3 disposes of the right in the grant itself: "Soweit Datenbanken oder Zusammenstellungen von Daten Schutzgegenstand dieser Lizenz oder Teil dessen sind und einen immaterialgüterrechtlichen Schutz eigener Art genießen, verzichtet der Lizenzgeber auf die Geltendmachung sämtlicher daraus resultierender Rechte.", and Ziffer 4 adds that the restrictions do not apply to the parts of the Schutzgegenstand that fall under the definition only because they enjoy sui generis database protection. Exercising that right is therefore permitted by this licence and dalicc:suiGenerisDatabaseRights is now a permission of the record. It carries no duty, which is where the 3.0 ports part company with the 4.0 text their parent CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 models: Section 4(c) of 4.0 carries the conditions of Section 3(a) over to the database layer, while this port takes its own restrictions off the material that qualifies only under the database right. Under the proposed default rule eu-sui-generis-db of licensedata/dependencygraph/dg_eu.ttl the database right is not granted unless the licence grants it, so a record that is silent reads as a licence that keeps the right back, which this text contradicts.

major Rubric 7 dalicc:terminatesOnBreach applied

The termination clause of this port reads: "Diese Lizenz und die durch sie erteilte Nutzungsbewilligung erlöschen mit Wirkung für die Zukunft im Falle eines Verstoßes gegen die Lizenzbedingungen durch Sie ohne dass es dazu der Kenntnis des Lizenzgebers vom Verstoß oder einer weiteren Handlung einer der Vertragsparteien bedarf." The licence ends automatically on a breach and this version of the text has no reinstatement clause, so dalicc:terminatesOnBreach is true and no dalicc:curePeriod is written, as on the unported record of the same version.

settled odrl:permission

The record permits odrl:modify and dalicc:ModifiedWorks, but the 3.0 NoDerivatives text grants no right to adapt the work at all. The grant of Ziffer 3 of the NoDerivatives port omits the adaptation right entirely: it lists only reproduction, integration into collections, and public communication and distribution. The 4.0 International parent CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 does permit producing adapted material and only forbids sharing it, which is where the modelling comes from, but 3.0 is not 4.0 on this point. Removing the two statements changes the compatibility outcome and touches every 2.0 and 3.0 NoDerivatives record in the library, so it is proposed rather than applied.

settled odrl:prohibition

The licence forbids sublicensing and the record does not say so. Ziffer 4.a): "Sie dürfen den Schutzgegenstand nicht unterlizenzieren." The vocabulary already has dalicc:sublicense, but no record in the library uses it and its skos:note says so, and the same sentence stands in every Creative Commons 2.0 and 3.0 record, so adding it to this review group alone would split the compatibility behaviour of one family. Proposed as one library wide correction, together with an update of the vocabulary note.