Eclipse Public License 1.0

History

This license model has 2 versions. Version 2 is the one served today; every earlier version keeps its own address, so a conclusion drawn from one of them can still be checked against it.

1. Version 2 current2026-09-24 Giray Havur

   The content review of 2026-09-15 added 1 clause text, 1 identification detail and 1 permission, removed 1 prohibition, changed 1 clause text, recorded the relation to the record this one was adapted from and recorded the review state. Later changes brought it in line with its family and its text in the verification of 2026-09-15 and named the license the record itself is published under.

   View version 2 JSON-LD Turtle RDF/XML

   26 changes

   • added dalicc:LiabilityLimitation "EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, NEITHER RECIPIENT NOR ANY CONTRIBUTORS SHALL HAVE ANY LIABILITY FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION LOST PROFITS), HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OR DISTRIBUTION OF THE PROGRAM OR THE EXERCISE OF ANY RIGHTS GRANTED HEREUNDER, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES."

     Review finding dalicc:WarrantyDisclaimer held the text of section 6, DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY, and there was no dalicc:LiabilityLimitation. Moved section 6 to the liability field and put section 5, NO WARRANTY, in the warranty field.

   • changed dalicc:WarrantyDisclaimer "EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, THE PROGRAM IS PROVIDED ON AN \"AS IS\" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Each Recipient is solely responsible for determining the appropriateness of using and distributing the Program and assumes all risks associated with its exercise of rights under this Agreement , including but not limited to the risks and costs of program errors, compliance with applicable laws, damage to or loss of data, programs or equipment, and unavailability or interruption of operations."

     was dalicc:WarrantyDisclaimer "EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, NEITHER RECIPIENT NOR ANY CONTRIBUTORS SHALL HAVE ANY LIABILITY FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION LOST PROFITS), HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OR DISTRIBUTION OF THE PROGRAM OR THE EXERCISE OF ANY RIGHTS GRANTED HEREUNDER, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES."

     Review finding dalicc:WarrantyDisclaimer held the text of section 6, DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY, and there was no dalicc:LiabilityLimitation. Moved section 6 to the liability field and put section 5, NO WARRANTY, in the warranty field.

   • added dalicc:reviewStatus dalicc:Reviewed

     Review state Every record records how far it has come in the editorial workflow and when it was last checked against the legal text.

   • added dalicc:reviewedOn "2026-09-15"^^xsd:date

     Review state Every record records how far it has come in the editorial workflow and when it was last checked against the legal text.

   • added dalicc:variantKind "version"

     Port relation The 2026-09-15 review made the relation between a jurisdiction port and the record it was adapted from explicit in the data.

   • added permission dalicc:ChangeLicense with duties [dalicc:compliantLicense]

     Review finding Section 3 also states: "A Contributor may choose to distribute the Program in object code form under its own license agreement, provided that ..." followed by four compliance conditions. That is dalicc:ChangeLicense with a dalicc:compliantLicense duty, exactly as the EPL-2.0 record models section 3.1(b). Added, which also brings the two Eclipse records into line.

   • removed prohibition cc:ShareAlike

     Review finding Section 3 states: "When the Program is made available in source code form ... it must be made available under this Agreement". Prohibiting cc:ShareAlike asserts the opposite. Removed.

   • added spdx:licenseId "EPL-1.0"

     Review finding Added EPL-1.0; the title matches the SPDX name.

   • changed cc:attributionName "Eclipse"

     was cc:attributionName "Eclipse "

     Manual edit The review's finding on family consistency and consolidation decision 4: the record modelled no reciprocity although section 3 says 'When the Program is made available in source code form: a) it must be made available under this Agreement', it made no patent statement although section 2(b) grants one and section 7 ends it on patent litigation, and dct:publisher and cc:attributionName both ended with a space.

   • changed dct:publisher "Eclipse"

     was dct:publisher "Eclipse "

     Manual edit The review's finding on family consistency and consolidation decision 4: the record modelled no reciprocity although section 3 says 'When the Program is made available in source code form: a) it must be made available under this Agreement', it made no patent statement although section 2(b) grants one and section 7 ends it on patent litigation, and dct:publisher and cc:attributionName both ended with a space.

   • changed permission dalicc:ChangeLicense

     was permission dalicc:ChangeLicense with duties [dalicc:compliantLicense]

     Manual edit The review's finding on family consistency and consolidation decision 4: the record modelled no reciprocity although section 3 says 'When the Program is made available in source code form: a) it must be made available under this Agreement', it made no patent statement although section 2(b) grants one and section 7 ends it on patent litigation, and dct:publisher and cc:attributionName both ended with a space.

   • added permission dalicc:patentGrant

     Manual edit The review's finding on family consistency and consolidation decision 4: the record modelled no reciprocity although section 3 says 'When the Program is made available in source code form: a) it must be made available under this Agreement', it made no patent statement although section 2(b) grants one and section 7 ends it on patent litigation, and dct:publisher and cc:attributionName both ended with a space.

   • changed permission odrl:derive with duties [cc:ShareAlike]

     was permission odrl:derive

     Manual edit The review's finding on family consistency and consolidation decision 4: the record modelled no reciprocity although section 3 says 'When the Program is made available in source code form: a) it must be made available under this Agreement', it made no patent statement although section 2(b) grants one and section 7 ends it on patent litigation, and dct:publisher and cc:attributionName both ended with a space.

   • changed permission odrl:distribute with duties [cc:Attribution, cc:Notice, cc:ShareAlike, cc:SourceCode]

     was permission odrl:distribute with duties [cc:Attribution, cc:Notice, cc:SourceCode]

     Manual edit The review's finding on family consistency and consolidation decision 4: the record modelled no reciprocity although section 3 says 'When the Program is made available in source code form: a) it must be made available under this Agreement', it made no patent statement although section 2(b) grants one and section 7 ends it on patent litigation, and dct:publisher and cc:attributionName both ended with a space.

   • changed permission odrl:modify with duties [cc:ShareAlike, dalicc:modificationNotice]

     was permission odrl:modify with duties [dalicc:modificationNotice]

     Manual edit The review's finding on family consistency and consolidation decision 4: the record modelled no reciprocity although section 3 says 'When the Program is made available in source code form: a) it must be made available under this Agreement', it made no patent statement although section 2(b) grants one and section 7 ends it on patent litigation, and dct:publisher and cc:attributionName both ended with a space.

   • added prohibition dalicc:patentRetaliationTermination

     Manual edit The review's finding on family consistency and consolidation decision 4: the record modelled no reciprocity although section 3 says 'When the Program is made available in source code form: a) it must be made available under this Agreement', it made no patent statement although section 2(b) grants one and section 7 ends it on patent litigation, and dct:publisher and cc:attributionName both ended with a space.

   • changed permission cc:DerivativeWorks

     was permission cc:DerivativeWorks with duties [cc:Attribution, cc:Notice, cc:SourceCode, dalicc:modificationNotice]

     Manual edit Weak-copyleft family alignment of 2026-09-15: the record is brought onto the shape of CPL-1.0 and IPL-1.0, which model the same text. Section 2(a) grants the right to 'reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, distribute and sublicense the Contribution', so dalicc:sublicense replaces the older spelling odrl:grantUse and dalicc:ModifiedWorks is stated; the attribution, notice and source duties that sat on the derivative-works permission move onto odrl:modify and odrl:derive, where the rest of the family carries them; the unsupported dalicc:noWarrantyNotice permission and dalicc:addStatement prohibition go, because section 3 lets a distributor add its own notices rather than forbidding it; and the dalicc:promote prohibition goes, because this text has no trademark or endorsement clause at all.

   • added permission dalicc:ModifiedWorks

     Manual edit Weak-copyleft family alignment of 2026-09-15: the record is brought onto the shape of CPL-1.0 and IPL-1.0, which model the same text. Section 2(a) grants the right to 'reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, distribute and sublicense the Contribution', so dalicc:sublicense replaces the older spelling odrl:grantUse and dalicc:ModifiedWorks is stated; the attribution, notice and source duties that sat on the derivative-works permission move onto odrl:modify and odrl:derive, where the rest of the family carries them; the unsupported dalicc:noWarrantyNotice permission and dalicc:addStatement prohibition go, because section 3 lets a distributor add its own notices rather than forbidding it; and the dalicc:promote prohibition goes, because this text has no trademark or endorsement clause at all.

   • removed permission dalicc:noWarrantyNotice

     Manual edit Weak-copyleft family alignment of 2026-09-15: the record is brought onto the shape of CPL-1.0 and IPL-1.0, which model the same text. Section 2(a) grants the right to 'reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, distribute and sublicense the Contribution', so dalicc:sublicense replaces the older spelling odrl:grantUse and dalicc:ModifiedWorks is stated; the attribution, notice and source duties that sat on the derivative-works permission move onto odrl:modify and odrl:derive, where the rest of the family carries them; the unsupported dalicc:noWarrantyNotice permission and dalicc:addStatement prohibition go, because section 3 lets a distributor add its own notices rather than forbidding it; and the dalicc:promote prohibition goes, because this text has no trademark or endorsement clause at all.

   • added permission dalicc:sublicense

     Manual edit Weak-copyleft family alignment of 2026-09-15: the record is brought onto the shape of CPL-1.0 and IPL-1.0, which model the same text. Section 2(a) grants the right to 'reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, distribute and sublicense the Contribution', so dalicc:sublicense replaces the older spelling odrl:grantUse and dalicc:ModifiedWorks is stated; the attribution, notice and source duties that sat on the derivative-works permission move onto odrl:modify and odrl:derive, where the rest of the family carries them; the unsupported dalicc:noWarrantyNotice permission and dalicc:addStatement prohibition go, because section 3 lets a distributor add its own notices rather than forbidding it; and the dalicc:promote prohibition goes, because this text has no trademark or endorsement clause at all.

   • changed permission odrl:derive with duties [cc:Attribution, cc:Notice, cc:ShareAlike, cc:SourceCode, dalicc:modificationNotice]

     was permission odrl:derive with duties [cc:ShareAlike]

     Manual edit Weak-copyleft family alignment of 2026-09-15: the record is brought onto the shape of CPL-1.0 and IPL-1.0, which model the same text. Section 2(a) grants the right to 'reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, distribute and sublicense the Contribution', so dalicc:sublicense replaces the older spelling odrl:grantUse and dalicc:ModifiedWorks is stated; the attribution, notice and source duties that sat on the derivative-works permission move onto odrl:modify and odrl:derive, where the rest of the family carries them; the unsupported dalicc:noWarrantyNotice permission and dalicc:addStatement prohibition go, because section 3 lets a distributor add its own notices rather than forbidding it; and the dalicc:promote prohibition goes, because this text has no trademark or endorsement clause at all.

   • removed permission odrl:grantUse

     Manual edit Weak-copyleft family alignment of 2026-09-15: the record is brought onto the shape of CPL-1.0 and IPL-1.0, which model the same text. Section 2(a) grants the right to 'reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, distribute and sublicense the Contribution', so dalicc:sublicense replaces the older spelling odrl:grantUse and dalicc:ModifiedWorks is stated; the attribution, notice and source duties that sat on the derivative-works permission move onto odrl:modify and odrl:derive, where the rest of the family carries them; the unsupported dalicc:noWarrantyNotice permission and dalicc:addStatement prohibition go, because section 3 lets a distributor add its own notices rather than forbidding it; and the dalicc:promote prohibition goes, because this text has no trademark or endorsement clause at all.

   • changed permission odrl:modify with duties [cc:Attribution, cc:Notice, cc:ShareAlike, cc:SourceCode, dalicc:modificationNotice]

     was permission odrl:modify with duties [cc:ShareAlike, dalicc:modificationNotice]

     Manual edit Weak-copyleft family alignment of 2026-09-15: the record is brought onto the shape of CPL-1.0 and IPL-1.0, which model the same text. Section 2(a) grants the right to 'reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, distribute and sublicense the Contribution', so dalicc:sublicense replaces the older spelling odrl:grantUse and dalicc:ModifiedWorks is stated; the attribution, notice and source duties that sat on the derivative-works permission move onto odrl:modify and odrl:derive, where the rest of the family carries them; the unsupported dalicc:noWarrantyNotice permission and dalicc:addStatement prohibition go, because section 3 lets a distributor add its own notices rather than forbidding it; and the dalicc:promote prohibition goes, because this text has no trademark or endorsement clause at all.

   • removed prohibition dalicc:addStatement

     Manual edit Weak-copyleft family alignment of 2026-09-15: the record is brought onto the shape of CPL-1.0 and IPL-1.0, which model the same text. Section 2(a) grants the right to 'reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, distribute and sublicense the Contribution', so dalicc:sublicense replaces the older spelling odrl:grantUse and dalicc:ModifiedWorks is stated; the attribution, notice and source duties that sat on the derivative-works permission move onto odrl:modify and odrl:derive, where the rest of the family carries them; the unsupported dalicc:noWarrantyNotice permission and dalicc:addStatement prohibition go, because section 3 lets a distributor add its own notices rather than forbidding it; and the dalicc:promote prohibition goes, because this text has no trademark or endorsement clause at all.

   • removed prohibition dalicc:promote

     Manual edit Weak-copyleft family alignment of 2026-09-15: the record is brought onto the shape of CPL-1.0 and IPL-1.0, which model the same text. Section 2(a) grants the right to 'reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, distribute and sublicense the Contribution', so dalicc:sublicense replaces the older spelling odrl:grantUse and dalicc:ModifiedWorks is stated; the attribution, notice and source duties that sat on the derivative-works permission move onto odrl:modify and odrl:derive, where the rest of the family carries them; the unsupported dalicc:noWarrantyNotice permission and dalicc:addStatement prohibition go, because section 3 lets a distributor add its own notices rather than forbidding it; and the dalicc:promote prohibition goes, because this text has no trademark or endorsement clause at all.

   • added dct:license <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/>

     Manual edit Every record is published under CC BY 4.0. cc:license names the record DALICC keeps of that licence; dct:license now names it by the address Creative Commons publishes it at, so that a consumer matching the canonical IRI finds it.

2. Version 1

   The version this model had before the content review of 2026-09-15.

   View version 1 JSON-LD Turtle RDF/XML

Every change names the reason behind it: a finding of the content review, one of its library-wide decisions, the metadata that review wrote onto every record, or a hand edit. None of it is legal advice.